Design Error or Pilot Error? »
Just three years after it happened, we finally know what brought down American Airlines flight 587 in New York. Strangely enough, we've known this for three years: The tail fell off of the plane. But now, the issue is who is at fault. American says it's Airbus. Airbus says it's American.
No surprise. Everyone wants to blame someone else. But let me ask the question they ought to ask: If you were to build an airplane, and by simply using the controls, even improper use of the controls, the tail can fall off, who do you think is at fault? Here's a hint: No amount of training is going to change the fact that the tail broke off the plane.
If the pilot goes the wrong way and crashes into a mountain, I can see it being pilot error. If there is an explosion of some sort and the plane breaks apart, I'm okay with it being a design problem or perhaps even terrorism.
But come on - he's operating the controls and the plane falls apart? Even if he wasn't trained right, the plane shouldn't do that. In a nod to my wife's profession, perhaps it wasn't in the requirements. I can understand some organizations using that as an excuse, so let me be clear: If your vehicle can be operated in such a way that it can fall apart, you ought to spend some more time in the design phase.
