Mixed Up Math »
I'm not talking about the free, kookily fun software here. I'm talking about the math that is used by the government to measure our schools. Let's start with the basics. The government recently passed the No Child Left Behind Act to try and make sure our schools do a better job of educating our children. Nevermind that the people who are in positions to make such acts went through schools without the benefit of such a thing, and in general they've turned out okay.
Let's assume for a moment that this is a good idea. The results of this year's testing for North Carolina show that just over 70 percent of the schools in the state met the standard. Yet nearly 80 percent of the districts failed. Huh? The difference between the individual schools and the districts that they make up are due to some simply bizarre calculations that could only come from the government.
Let's assume that this is okay and take an even deeper look. Apparently a change in the law allowed those schools who were pretty close to the target to apply a margin of error and pretend that they made it. Why in the world do they even create a benchmark if you let people miss it? Didn't pass, Timmy? You were really close - we'll let you move to the next grade anyway. If this was a percent or two, I'd say it's not a big deal. But if you remove this requirement, the schools that passed drop to just 56 percent, meaning that nearly 15 percent of schools (and just over 21% of those that passed) did so because they came really close to their goals, even though they didn't achieve them.
And this is making things better? What exactly does it teach those children that in order to increase your performance, you need to make up new methods of calculating that performance?
